Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s high-profile custody battle has taken another twist, as both parties exchange allegations and strategies in their ongoing legal dispute. Brad Pitt, in a recent development, has voiced his concerns about what he perceives as Angelina Jolie’s calculated manipulation of the media and the public through what he characterizes as her “usual tactics,” as reported by The Post.

Brad Pitt has accused Angelina Jolie of ‘manipulating’ the situation by leveraging her public image and media influence to gain an advantage in their custody dispute. He claims that she has employed strategies aimed at swaying public opinion and shaping the narrative surrounding their case.

On the other side of the battle, Angelina Jolie continues to assert her position, alleging that the former judge overseeing their custody case, John Ouderkirk, exhibited a bias in favor of Brad Pitt. Jolie contends that Ouderkirk denied her children the opportunity to testify, despite California law allowing children over the age of 14 to do so. In a significant move, she succeeded in having Judge Ouderkirk removed from the case in July 2021.

Brad Pitt Accuses Angelina Jolie of Playing Media Tactics Amid Ongoing Custody Battle

Now, Angelina Jolie is taking further steps by advocating for a proposed legislation known as “Piqui’s Law.” This legislation seeks to mandate domestic violence training for judges and court staff, a measure she believes is essential to protect children from potentially abusive situations and provide crucial training to court professionals.

In her efforts to advance Piqui’s Law, Angelina Jolie has made a formal request to California Governor Gavin Newsom for his support. She argues that this law could play a vital role in safeguarding the rights and well-being of children involved in custody disputes.

Brad Pitt’s legal team, however, strongly contests Jolie’s allegations of bias and her attempt to link her custody case with the proposed legislation. They maintain that the 2021 appellate court ruling was primarily a procedural matter and had no bearing on the substantive facts of the custody case. They adamantly deny any wrongdoing by Judge Ouderkirk, asserting that he acted independently and without any undue influence.

Brad Pitt’s legal representatives have expressed disappointment in Jolie’s actions, likening them to “misrepresentations akin to those seen in political discourse” and accusing her of potentially harming innocent individuals involved in their case. They emphasize that the legislation she is supporting lacks a direct connection to the custody dispute, and they find it perplexing that her advocacy efforts seem to contain elements that could be viewed as defamatory and self-serving.

The custody battle between Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie continues to be closely watched by the public and the media, with each side vehemently defending their positions and taking strategic steps to secure their desired outcomes.

Check out The Other Latest Articles:

Unveiling the Enduring Bond: Jennifer Lawrence and Emma Stone’s Time-Tested Friendship

Emma Stone’s Remarkable Gesture at the 76th Golden Globes Sparks Conversation

Kanye West’s Enigmatic Relationship: Unveiling the Dynamics with Bianca Censori

Ariana Grande Offers Fans a Glimpse into Her Life Following Divorce Settlement with Dalton Gomez

Julie Bowen Continues to Stand by Sofia Vergara Amidst Divorce, Says ‘Friendship Matters Most

Meghan Markle Joins Forces with Prince Harry and Carson Daly to Illuminate the Dark Side of Social Media

Kim Kardashian’s Controversial Decision to Stand by Tristan Thompson